en English

Battle of Giants: Thuisbezorgd vs. Flink – A Comprehensive Comparison


The food delivery industry has witnessed a significant transformation over the past decade, with the emergence of various platforms striving to offer convenience, speed, and quality service to consumers. Among these platforms, Thuisbezorgd and Flink stand out as two giants competing fiercely for dominance in the market. In this detailed comparison, we delve into the intricacies of both platforms, exploring their features, business models, market presence, and the implications for consumers and restaurants alike.

Thuisbezorgd: The Pioneer of Online Food Delivery in the Netherlands

Thuisbezorgd vs. Flink

Thuisbezorgd, established in 2000 by Jitse Groen, is widely regarded as the pioneer of online food delivery in the Netherlands. Initially launched as a simple website facilitating food orders from local restaurants, it has since evolved into a comprehensive platform with a vast network of partner restaurants across the country. Thuisbezorgd’s user-friendly interface, extensive restaurant options, and efficient delivery service have solidified its position as a household name in the Dutch food delivery landscape.

Key Features of Thuisbezorgd

Extensive Restaurant Network: Thuisbezorgd boasts a diverse array of partner restaurants, ranging from popular chains to local eateries, offering cuisines spanning various cultures and tastes. This extensive network ensures that users have access to a wide selection of dining options, catering to diverse preferences.

Seamless Ordering Experience: The platform’s intuitive interface and user-friendly design make the ordering process effortless and convenient. Users can easily browse menus, customise their orders, and complete transactions with just a few clicks, streamlining the entire food delivery experience.

Reliable Delivery Service: Thuisbezorgd prioritises prompt and reliable delivery, striving to ensure that orders reach customers in a timely manner. Through its efficient logistics infrastructure and partnerships with delivery couriers, the platform endeavours to minimise wait times and maintain high standards of service quality.

Flink: Disrupting the Food Delivery Landscape with Hyperlocal Fulfilment

Thuisbezorgd vs. Flink

Flink, founded in 2021 by Onno van den Brink, represents a disruptive force in the food delivery industry with its innovative approach to hyperlocal fulfilment. Unlike traditional delivery platforms that rely on centralised distribution hubs, Flink operates a network of dark stores strategically located in urban areas, enabling rapid order fulfilment and shorter delivery times. This decentralised model aims to address common pain points associated with food delivery, such as long wait times and delivery delays.

Key Features of Flink

Hyperlocal Fulfilment: Flink’s network of dark stores, strategically positioned within densely populated areas, allows for hyperlocal fulfilment of orders. By minimising the distance between fulfilment centres and customers, the platform can offer swift delivery times, often within minutes of placing an order.

Curated Product Selection: Flink curates its product selection carefully, focusing on high-quality, locally sourced items that resonate with consumers. From fresh produce to pantry staples and prepared meals, the platform offers a diverse range of products to meet the needs of urban dwellers seeking convenience and quality.

Sustainable Practices: Sustainability is a core focus for Flink, reflected in its commitment to eco-friendly packaging, efficient delivery routes, and reduced food waste. By prioritising sustainability throughout its operations, the platform aims to minimise its environmental footprint and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Performance Metrics

Market Share


  • Thuisbezorgd holds the lion’s share of the Dutch food delivery market, with estimates placing its market share at over 50%.
  • Its long-established presence and widespread brand recognition contribute to its dominance in the market.


  • As a relatively new player in the market, Flink’s market share is still growing but remains smaller compared to Thuisbezorgd. Currently Flink has an 11% market share in Germany.
  • Flink’s innovative approach to hyperlocal fulfilment has garnered attention and market share in select urban areas where it operates.
Thuisbezorgd vs. Flink

Geographic Reach


  • Thuisbezorgd has a nationwide presence in the Netherlands, covering both urban and rural areas.
  • Its extensive network of partner restaurants ensures broad geographic coverage, enabling users across the country to access its services.


  • Flink’s geographic reach is currently limited compared to Thuisbezorgd, with operations focused on select urban centres.
  • While its presence may be concentrated in specific regions, Flink’s hyperlocal fulfilment model allows for rapid expansion within urban areas.

Number of Restaurant Partners

Thuisbezorgd – Over 45,000 restaurant partners across Europe

  • Thuisbezorgd boasts a vast network of restaurant partners, a total of over 45,000 restaurant partners across Europe.
  • Its diverse selection of partner restaurants spans various cuisines and categories, catering to a wide range of consumer preferences.


  • Flink’s network of restaurant partners is comparatively smaller. While the exact number is not known, Flink serves at over 140 locations in more than 60 cities in Europe.
  • While the number of partners may be smaller, Flink prioritises quality over quantity, ensuring that its partner restaurants align with its brand values and product standards.

Monthly Active Users


  • Thuisbezorgd currently has 5.6M monthly active users, leveraging its widespread brand recognition and user-friendly platform to attract and retain customers. 
  • Its established presence and comprehensive service offerings contribute to high user engagement and retention rates.


  • Flink’s user base is growing steadily. Currently, their platform has over 593.6K monthly active users.
  • While its monthly active user count may be lower compared to Thuisbezorgd, Flink’s focus on urban markets and hyperlocal fulfilment drives strong engagement among its target demographic.
Thuisbezorgd vs. Flink



  • Thuisbezorgd generates significant revenue through commission fees charged to partner restaurants for each order processed through the platform.
  • Its large user base and extensive restaurant network contribute to robust revenue streams, sustaining its position as a market leader.


  • Flink’s revenue streams may differ from Thuisbezorgd due to its vertically integrated model and focus on direct-to-consumer sales.
  • While specifics on revenue figures may not be publicly available, Flink’s emphasis on efficiency and cost optimization suggests a strategic focus on profitability alongside growth.

User Experience


  • Thuisbezorgd offers a seamless user experience characterised by its intuitive interface, extensive restaurant selection, and reliable delivery service.
  • Its long-standing presence and brand recognition instil trust and confidence among users, contributing to a positive overall experience.


  • Flink prioritises user experience through its emphasis on speed, convenience, and quality.
  • Its hyperlocal fulfilment model enables ultra-fast delivery times, enhancing user satisfaction and driving loyalty among urban consumers seeking instant gratification.

Comparative Analysis

Business Models

Thuisbezorgd operates on a marketplace model, acting as an intermediary between restaurants and customers. It generates revenue through commission fees charged to partner restaurants for each order processed through the platform.

Flink adopts a vertically integrated approach, managing its own inventory and fulfilment operations through dark stores. While Thuisbezorgd benefits from a vast network of partner restaurants, Flink’s direct control over its supply chain enables greater flexibility and efficiency in order fulfilment.

Market Presence

Thuisbezorgd commands a dominant position in the Dutch food delivery market, with a long-established presence and widespread brand recognition. Its extensive restaurant network and user-friendly interface have solidified its status as the go-to platform for online food ordering in the Netherlands. 

On the other hand, Flink is a relatively new entrant but has rapidly gained traction with its innovative hyperlocal fulfilment model. While its presence is currently limited to select urban areas, Flink’s expansion plans indicate ambitions for broader market penetration in the future.

User Experience

Both Thuisbezorgd and Flink prioritise user experience, albeit through different approaches. Thuisbezorgd excels in offering a wide selection of restaurants and cuisines, catering to diverse tastes and preferences. Its seamless ordering process and reliable delivery service contribute to a positive user experience for customers. 

Flink distinguishes itself with ultra-fast delivery times and a curated selection of high-quality products. Its emphasis on convenience and efficiency resonates with urban consumers seeking instant gratification and premium offerings.

Impact on Restaurants

For partner restaurants, the choice between Thuisbezorgd and Flink entails considerations beyond customer reach and visibility. While Thuisbezorgd offers access to a broad customer base and established brand recognition, its commission fees can impact profit margins for restaurants, particularly smaller establishments.

Flink’s vertically integrated model promises lower fees and greater control over the delivery process, potentially appealing to restaurants looking to optimise costs and streamline operations.


In the dynamic landscape of online food delivery, Thuisbezorgd and Flink emerge as formidable contenders, each with its own strengths and strategic advantages. Thuisbezorgd’s long-standing presence, extensive restaurant network, and user-friendly interface position it as a trusted leader in the Dutch market. 

Flink’s innovative hyperlocal fulfilment model and focus on sustainability present a compelling alternative, particularly for urban consumers seeking convenience and quality. As these platforms continue to evolve and expand, their competition will likely drive further innovation and enhancements, ultimately benefiting consumers and restaurants alike in the quest for superior food delivery experiences.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

More like this

Holidu vs. Airbnb: Which One Should You Choose for Your Next Vacation?

In the world of vacation rentals, two prominent platforms...

LSKD vs. Lorna Jane: The Ultimate Activewear Showdown

In the world of activewear, two brands have made...

La Redoute Vs El Corte Inglés: Comparing Two Leading Marketplaces of Spain

The European retail industry is wide enough to be...

Choosing Quality Fashion: 5.10.15 vs. Melijoe

In the ever-expanding digital marketplace of children's fashion, European...